MASSACHUSETTS
SIERRA CLUB | Sprawl &Transportation 10 Milk Street, Ste 632, Boston, MA 02108-4621 | Ph:617.423.5775 | Fax:617.890.0338
THE SILVER LINE - OR SILVER LIE
The highways that are built to sustain our sprawling suburbs add to our
pollution and energy problems, and increase our dependence on an
auto-centric way of life which is unhealthy, anti-social, and unsustainable.
The Sierra Club encourages public transit and pedestrian- and
bicycle-friendly neighborhoods.
The Silver Line is the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority's
(MBTA's) so-called Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) line, running in two,
unconnected sections, from Dudley Square in Roxbury to downtown Boston,
Massachusetts and from South Station to several points in South Boston and
to Logan Airport in East Boston. The Silver Line is planned to be built in
three phases; only phase I and part of phase II have been completed. Phase
III, a connection between the two sections, is planned for some time after
2013. Silver Line buses are wheelchair ramp equipped using a kneeling bus
and a flip-out ramp. (courtesy of
Wikipedia)
Click on the map to enlarge it But
no
matter what color you paint a bus, it still gets stuck in traffic. Over 15
years ago, the MBTA – after tearing down the elevated Orange Line –
promised equal or better service. For 15 years, that service was a
dirty diesel bus that contributed to residents' suffering asthma rates
six times higher than the state average. Now the MBTA has unveiled its
equal or better plans: building an elaborate tunnel system
underneath downtown Boston so buses can turn around. Otherwise known as
the "Silver Line Phase III," this plan will cost millions more than using
existing tunnels and restoring light rail service on Washington Street.
Even MBTA studies showed using the existing tunnel for Green Line-type
service is only a matter of new lights and tracks, a substantial savings.
What's wrong with the Silver Line?
A rail tunnel already exists that can serve Washington Street and
the Roxbury community, tying them directly into the Green Line to
Downtown and the rest of the MBTA’s subway system.
Light rail will cost hundreds of millions of dollars less to
implement than a new bus system.
A new bus tunnel will require tearing up the newly refurbished YMCA,
large swaths of Chinatown, the Theater District, and the Boston Common.
A new bus tunnel will require tearing up large swaths of Chinatown,
the Theater District, Bay Village, and the Boston Common. Construction
of a portal will entail massive disruption to the abutting neighborhood,
whatever location is finally chosen for it. Possible locations include
in front of the fire house on Columbus Avenue at Berkeley Street, beside
the Tufts New England Medical Center, and in front of the Mass Pike
Towers apartment complex—possibly requiring the demolition of several
residential buildings. Most of the tunnel will be constructed through
filled land, endangering groundwater levels and the stability of the
many nineteenth century buildings along its route. Whatever the portal
location is finally chosen, the buses will be emerging from the tunnel
into a congested urban environment, turning on their diesel engines
immediately adjacent to thousands of neighborhood residents and hospital
patients.
In times of fiscal crisis, the MBTA should look at ways to do more for
less. Since the MBTA already stated that rail service would increase
ridership by 2 to 2.5 times that of a bus and cost $800 million less, we
should make the switch to light rail.